ISSN 1814-6090 (Print)
ISSN 2542-1964 (Online)


For citation:

Svinin A. O., Zamaletdinov R. I., Mikhailova R. I., Tamimdarov B. F. Geometric morphometry application to detecting water frog species (Ranidae, Amphibia). Current Studies in Herpetology, 2026, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 79-84. DOI: 10.18500/1814-6090-2026-26-1-2-79-84, EDN: WDFEET

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 22)
Полный текст в формате PDF(En):
(downloads: 14)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Short communication
UDC: 
591.4
EDN: 
WDFEET

Geometric morphometry application to detecting water frog species (Ranidae, Amphibia)

Autors: 
Svinin Anton O., FSBEI HE "Mari State University"
Zamaletdinov R. I., FSAEI HE "Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University"
Mikhailova Regina I., Kazan State Agrarian University
Tamimdarov Bulat F., Kazan State Agrarian University
Abstract: 

This study presents findings on the application of geometric morphometry for analyzing cranial features and the metatarsal tubercle shape in three species of water frogs (Pelophylax esculentus complex). Our analysis of the metatarsal tubercle shape using principal component analysis revealed a separation of taxa along the first principal component axis at 84.9%. No overlap in the shape of the metatarsal tubercle was observed among the parental species; however, the values for these traits in the hybrid P. esculentus transgressed those of the parental species. The selected cranial features exhibited similarities among the water frog species, with their separation not exceeding 50%. Further refinement of this methodology may facilitate the identification of critical osteological traits for species detection within this complex.

Reference: 
  1. Ananjeva N. B, Borkin L. J., Darevsky I. S., Orlov N. L. Amphibians and Reptiles. Encyclopedia of Nature of Russia. Moscow, ABF, 1998. 576 p. (in Russian).
  2. Bannikov A. G., Darevsky I. S., Ishchenko V. G., Rustamov A. K., Szczerbak N. N. Opredelitel zemnovodnykh i presmykayushchikhsya fauny SSSR [A Guide to Amphibians and Reptiles of Fauna of USSR]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1977. 415 p. (in Russian).
  3. Borisovsky A. G., Borkin L. Ya., Litvinchuk S. N., Rozanov Yu. M. Morphometric characteristics of green frogs (Rana esculenta complex) in Udmurtia. Bulletin of Udmurt University, 2000, no. 5, pp. 70–75 (in Russian).
  4. Kuzmin S. L. The Amphibians of the former Soviet Union. Moscow, KMK Scientific Press, 2012. 370 p. (in Russian).
  5. Nekrasova O. D., Morozov-Leonov S. Yu. 2001. Diagnostics of Frogs of Rana esculenta complex (Amphibia, Ranidae) in hybrid populations in the environs of Dnieper. Vestnik Zoologii, 2001, vol. 35, iss. 5, pp. 45–50 (in Russian).
  6. Tarashchuk S. V. Scheme of morphometric processing of representatives of the family of true frogs. In: Guide to the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Kyiv, Naukova Dumka, 1989, pp. 73–74 (in Russian).
  7. Terentjeff P. W. Zur Systematik der grunen Frosche. Russkii gidrobiologicheskii zhurnal. 1922, vol. 1, no. 11–12, pp. 318–320 (in Russian).
  8. Berger L. European green frogs and their protection. Ecological Library Foundation. Poznan, Research Centre For Agricultural and Forest Environment, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2008. 39 p.
  9. Blain H. A., Lózano-Fernández I., Böhme G. Variation in the ilium of central European water frogs Pelophylax (Amphibia, Ranidae) and its implications for species-level identification of fragmentary anuran fossils. Zoological Studies, 2015, vol. 54, art. e5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40555-014-0094-3
  10. Böhme G., Günther R. Osteological studies in the European water frogs Rana ridibunda, Rana lessonae and Ranaesculenta” (Anura, Ranidae). Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 1979, Bd. 55, no. 1, S. 203–215.
  11. Ermakov O., Ivanov A., Titov S., Svinin A., Litvinchuk S. New multiplex PCR method for identification of east European green frog species and their hybrids. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 2019, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 367–370. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2019-26-6-367-370
  12. Pagano A., Joly P. Limits of the morphometric method for field identification of water frogs. Alytes, 1999, vol. 16, pp. 130–138.
  13. Plötner J. Die westpaläarktischen Wasserfrösche von Märtyren der Wissenschaft zur bioloaischen Sensation. Bielefeld, Laurenti, 2005. 160 S.
  14. Schmeller D. S. Tying ecology and genetics of hemiclonally reproducing waterfrogs (Rana, Anura). Anna-les Zoologici Fennici, 2004, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 681–687. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23735961
  15. Svinin A. O., Dedukh D. V., Borkin L. J., Ermakov O. A., Ivanov A. Y., Litvinchuk Y. S., ZamaletdinovR. I., Mikhaylova R. I., Trubyanov A. B., Skorinov D. V., Rosanov Y. M., Litvinchuk S. N. Genetic structure, morphological variation, and gametogenic peculiarities in water frogs (Pelophylax) from northeastern European Russia. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 2020, vol. 59, pp. 646–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12447
  16. Vinogradov A. E., Borkin L. J., Gunther R., Rosanov J. M. Genome elimination in diploid and triploid Rana esculenta males: Cytological evidence from DNA flow cytometry. Genome, 1990, vol. 33, pp. 619–627.
  17. Zelditch M. L., Swiderski D. L., Sheets H. D., Fink W. L. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. San Diego, Elsevier Academic Press, 2004. 437 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012778460-1/50003-X
Received: 
10.03.2025
Accepted: 
02.04.2026
Published: 
30.06.2026