Cite this article as:

Stepankova I. V., Afrin K. A., Ivolga R. A., Kidov A. A. Comparative Characteristics of Morphometric and Reproductive Parameters of the Common Brown Frog, Rana temporaria (Amphipia, Ranidae) from the Populations of Old and New Moscow. Current Studies in Herpetology, 2020, vol. 20, iss. 1, pp. 53-60. DOI:

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).

Comparative Characteristics of Morphometric and Reproductive Parameters of the Common Brown Frog, Rana temporaria (Amphipia, Ranidae) from the Populations of Old and New Moscow


The paper discusses the results of our study of the variability of some morphometric and reproductive characteristics in the common brown frog, Rana temporaria, from two populations of the Moscow city. The first population exists in isolation in the Timiryazev Forest Park, for a long time surrounded by districts with multi-storey buildings. The second population is located on the territory with mainly rural buildings (the settlement Kokoshkino), recently annexed to Moscow. The size and reproductive parameters in frogs from these two localities were compared. The frogs from the Timiryazev Park surpassed those from Kokoshkino by the majority of these parameters. The authors note that R. temporaria from the studied populations have very large sizes and high fertility, surpassing these characteristics of the frogs from adjacent habitats in the Moscow and Kaluga regions. A strong dependence of females’ fertility from the length and weight of their body was revealed.


Bannikov A. G., Darevsky I. S., Ishchenko V. G., Rustamov A. K., Szczerbak N. N. Opredelitel zemnovodnykh i presmykayushchikhsya fauny SSSR [A Guide of Amphibians and Reptiles of Fauna of USSR]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1977. 415 p. (in Russian).

Bolotnikov A. M., Mazherina L. L. Impact of Physical and Chemical Composition of Water on Amphibian Life Activity. The Problems of Herpetology: Theses of Communications of 6th Herpetological Conference. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1985. 34 p. (in Russian).

Vershinin V. L. Morpha Striata in the Members of the Genus Rana (Amphibia, Anura), the Reasons of Adaptability to Environmental Changes. Biology Bulletin Reviews, 2008, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 65 – 71 (in Russian).

Kiseleva E. I. Behavioral Responses of Rana temporaria Tadpoles to Excretions of Adult Sympatric Anuran Amphibian. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 2011, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 1093–1104 (in Russian).

Korzikov V. A., Ruchin A. B. Dependence of the Brown Frog – Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1768 (Amphibia: Anura) Fertility on its Dimension-age Structure. Current Studies in Herpetology, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 1–2, pp. 71–73 (in Russian).

Kuzmin S. L. Amphibians of the Former USSR. Second ed. Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2012. 370 p. (in Russian).

Lebedinsky A. A., Pomorina E. N. Some Peculiarities of a Common Frog Population Inhabiting an Urbanized Territory. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, Ser. Biologiya, 2008, no. 2, pp. 91–95 (in Russian).

Lyapkov S. M. Age Composition and Growth Characteristics of Rana temporaria from Populations With Extremally Short Activity Season. University proceedings. Volga region. Natural sciences, 2019, no. 1, pp. 94–101 (in Russian).

Lyapkov S. M., Kornilova M. B., Severtsov A. S. Variation Structure of Reproductive Characteristics in Rana temporaria and Their Relationships With Size and Age of the Frog. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 2002, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 719 – 733 (in Russian).

Reshetnikov A. N. Does Rotan Perccottus glenii (Perciformes: Odontobutidae) eat the Eggs of Fish and Amphibians? J. of Ichthyology, 2008, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 384–392 (in Russian).

Ruchin A.B., Alekseev S.K., Korzikov V.A. A Study of the Trophic Spectra of Syntopic Rana arvalis and R. temporaria Under Cohabitation. Current Studies in Herpetology, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 3–4, pp. 23–27 (in Russian).

Samoylov B. L., Morozova G. V. The Common Frog Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758]. In: Krasnaia kniga goroda Moskvy. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. [The Red Data Book of the Moscow]. Moscow, Departament prirodopol'zovaniia i okhrany okruzhaiushchei sredy goroda Moskvy Publ., 2011, pp. 277–281 (in Russian).

Stepankova I. V., Kidov A. A. First results of the amphibian fauna inventory in the Forest experimental station of Timiryazev academy (Moscow). University proceedings. Volga region. Natural sciences, 2019, no. 4, pp. 61–70 (in Russian).

Ishchenko V. G. Growth of Brown Frogs of Fauna of Russia: Some Problems of Study of Growth in Amphibians. Russian J. of Herpetology, 2005, vol. 12, spec. iss., pp. 153–157.

Joly P. Variation in Size and Fecundity Between Neighbouring Populations of the Common Frog, Rana temporaria. Alytes, 1991, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 79–88.

Reshetnikov A. N. The Introduced Fish, Rotan (Perccottus glenii), Depresses Populations of Aquatic Animals (Macroinvertebrates, Amphibians, and a Fish). Hydrobiologia, 2003, vol. 510, no. 1–3, pp. 83–90.

Short text (in English): 
Full text (in Russian): 
Номер страницы (по):